Navigation
Keep ATVs Off Vermont's Roads
Keep ATVs Off The Lamoille Valley River Trail
Economic Impact of Snowmobiling
ORV's and Air Quality
ATV Liability Issues
Peak Oil, Climate Change and ORVs
Gov. Douglas and The ATV Working Collaboration
Have an ORV story?
What Others Say About ORVs
Links & Resources
Vermont Legislators
Home
Contact Us
PRT VT
P.O. Box 103
E. Hardwick, VT 05836
info@prtvt.org
|
Keep ATVs Off The Lamoille Valley Rail Trail
Please act now to keep ATVs off the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail (LVRT) -- a proposed multi-use trail (including bicycling, walking, running, and horses in the non-snow months) across northern Vermont.
This 96-mile rail-trail from St. Johnsbury to Swanton has been formally under discussion for at least 6 years -- and all public discussion so far has been for a NON-MOTORIZED trail in the summer.
The LVRT would be for bicycling, walking, horseback riding... This concept for the trail has been widely endorsed by many of the communities along the former rail corridor.
But now, the Vermont ATV association (VASA) is trying to get access to this state-owned corridor. The Douglas administration, namely the Agency of Transportation, has begun to develop policies and procedures that would allow crossings and "doglegs"; sections of trail that serve as connectors to other trails. This would fundamentally change the character of the trail, and it is NOT what the affected communities and other users have embraced. It could also serve as a dangerous precedent to open the door to ATVs on other public lands.
Please contact Trini Brassard at the Agency of Transportation, the Governor's office and your state legislators (see link below), especially House members, as soon as possible to voice your objection!
Details, Background, Talking Points:
There is pressure from the Vermont ATV Sportsman's Association (VASA) to allow ATVs on the proposed Lamoille Valley Rail Trail (LVRT). This trail has been presented to and accepted by affected communities over the past 6+ years as a non-motorized trail (with snowmobile use the only motorized exception). ATVs have been specifically prohibited in all the discussions regarding who will have use of the trail, from public hearings to legislative committee hearings. The House transportation committee periodically reviews the lease between the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and VAST and may consider ATV use as part of the lease discussion.
ATVs present a SERIOUS safety concern. ATV¹s on the trail would also diminish the trail experience because of noise, pollution, dust, and user conflicts. A trail that includes ATV use would NOT realize the vision for the trail that was envisioned by the legislature and the committees, communities, and other users involved in planning the LVRT: "We envision a rural rail/trail facility that will provide a tranquil environment so all users can enjoy nature and the scenic Vermont landscape to its fullest. This tranquil environment will become an inviting place where the elderly and the handicapped can enjoy leisurely endeavors and bicyclists can set their own pace... short rides or multiple day trips."
Moreover, the value of the trail as a tourism destination for bicycling and walking would be greatly diminished by the addition of ATVs. Bicyclists, walkers, and runners are looking for a non- motorized trail experience - to get away from the stress and traffic on the roads. Introducing a motorized use during the summer would fundamentally change this trail from a special haven for non- motorized users to a corridor with as much if not more motor vehicle traffic than many of Vermont's rural dirt roads. Tourists would not travel from other states to ride on a trail with ATVs.
ATVs have been tried in other states for shared-use trails -- and the result is that they drive away the other trail users. In some cases, experimental ATV-sharing has led to the ATVs being banned. This is not what the Vermont communities along the corridor have been looking forward to.
The proposed trail goes through Swanton, Highgate, Sheldon, Fairfield, Bakersfield, Fletcher, Cambridge/Jeffersonville, Johnson, Hyde Park, Morristown/Morrisville, Wolcott, Hardwick, Greensboro Bend, Walden, Cabot, Danville, and St. Johnsbury. A map & other information is available at: www.nvds.net
Please contact your legislators, particularly legislators along the corridor, and those sitting on the House Transportation Committee. It is most important right now to contact the members of the House. Here's a link to the legislative directory: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/legdir/legdir2.htm or you can leave a message for any legislator by calling the Sergeant at Arms at (800) 322-5616. You can also FAX a note to your legislator (handwritten is fine!) to 802-828-2424.
Talking points:
- This trail has been proposed and accepted by the communities over the past 6+ years as a non-motorized corridor in the non-snow months. In all public statements and documents, ATVs have specifically been excluded. The municipalities along the trail have embraced the idea of the trail -- as a non-motorized corridor, not as an ATV Trail. Town plans that support the trail are looking forward to a bicycling, walking, and equestrian trail in the summer. Neither VTrans nor the state legislature should override this long-standing public expectation for the trail.
- The most appropriate place for this project to be managed is through the VTrans local transportation facilities program. This is the agency that has the expertise and capacity to be the agency contact for this type of trail. The Recreational Trails Program of the Agency of Natural Resources does not have the capacity nor expertise to be the agency for this project.
- ATV use of the trail would create a safety hazard for children, families, and others who might like to walk and bike on the trail. It is the non-motorized opportunity that makes this trail special.
- Allowing ATV use on the trail would open the politically- sensitive question of ATVs on public lands, a question that has not yet been resolved within the state. Many thousands of Vermonters have expressed strong opposition to ATV's on public lands.
- Seriously considering ATV use would trigger a public outcry, lawsuits, and other debate that will hold up the construction of this trail.
- Feel free to add your own opinions about ATVs.
PLEASE CONTACT
House Transportation committee members, your legislators, and any other legislators you have a connection with, as soon as possible!!
Find their phone # at legislative directory It is most important to contact members of the House right now. Or you can leave a message for any legislator by calling the Sergeant at Arms at (800) 322-5616. You can also FAX a note to your legislator (handwritten is fine!) at 802-828-2424.
Members of the House Transportation committee:
- Representative Westman of Cambridge, Chair
- Representative Masland of Thetford, Vice-Chair
- Representative Monti of Barre City
- Representative Audette of S. Burlington
- Representative Brennan of Colchester
- Representative Corcoran of Bennington
- Representative Fitzgerald of St. Albans City
- Representative Minter of Waterbury
- Representative Peaslee of Guildhall
- Representative Potter of Clarendon
- Representative Scheuermann of Stowe, Clerk
|